<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crystal Balls pt 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/2009/09/crystal-balls-pt-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/2009/09/crystal-balls-pt-1/</link>
	<description>The Dozen is an eclectic take on innovation, branding, media, strategy and research, brought to you by the creative minds at Egg Strategy.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/2009/09/crystal-balls-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-32525</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/?p=710#comment-32525</guid>
		<description>Clearly Krugman isn't in here, right? :)  Is this an average of Wall Street economists?  Because that might explain why they are so optimistic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Krugman isn&#8217;t in here, right? <img src='http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Is this an average of Wall Street economists?  Because that might explain why they are so optimistic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amunsell</title>
		<link>http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/2009/09/crystal-balls-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-32479</link>
		<dc:creator>amunsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eggstrategy.com/blog/?p=710#comment-32479</guid>
		<description>I think what your graph shows is a reluctance for forecaseters to take a radical stance, where predicting the status quo is much safer and more often rewarded than delivering very bad or very good news.

In this your analogy to predicting the future of brands is pretty interesting.  We tend not to take big risks with brands, prefering the status quo with slight modifications.  Is risk, in the context of brands, so badly rewarded that it encourages this behavior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what your graph shows is a reluctance for forecaseters to take a radical stance, where predicting the status quo is much safer and more often rewarded than delivering very bad or very good news.</p>
<p>In this your analogy to predicting the future of brands is pretty interesting.  We tend not to take big risks with brands, prefering the status quo with slight modifications.  Is risk, in the context of brands, so badly rewarded that it encourages this behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
